JUSTIFICATION FOR MULTIPLE CHOICE (a) AS THE BEST ANSWER FOR PART 1b
Of the 8 a-through-h multiple choices in Part 1b "a" is the best one.
To wit:
If we look at the choices in reverse order we get:
Answer can't be
(h: None of Above) because "a" is more applicable than is no answer as well
as is (b OR c) and/or (d OR e) depending on how loosely you define your terms.
Answer can't be
(g: All of Above) because (b & c) are mutually exclusive as is
(d & e) depending on how tightly you define your terms.
It can't really be
(f) because this applies more to the actual Clinton Presidency
than to the Gore-Lieberman aspiring Presidency.
What about
(e) losers? NOT, because true loser is one who is anti-goal achievement
and this not the case for any of the contenders. For elaboration see P.S. in
As I was saying...
Or
(d) victims? NOT, because all victims are helpless and if not helpless
then NOT victim and Gore-Lieberman NOT helpless (as to whether or not they or any of us
religiously indoctrinated post neonates were helpless victims is a different
issue).
So this leaves
c or
b or
a.
Since
b isn't fair to Mr. Lieberman and
c is ambiguous this leaves
(a) as the only --hence best-- choice.